Amazon Echo is the connected speaker with voice commands




Voice assistants have started to gain traction thanks to the success of products like Google Now and Siri, but now Amazon is joining the fray with a completely different approach of its own, the Amazon Echo.

Instead of being locked to your mobile device, Echo is a standalone speaker that’s meant to give you easy access to information such as the news and weather while at home (indeed, it needs to be plugged in to an outlet). It can also set alarms and timers, make lists or answer questions using sources like Wikipedia.



It can also play audio from various sources, including Amazon Prime, iHeartRadio, and TuneIn. Alternatively, you can use Bluetooth to stream audio from your devices, like any other wireless speaker.

The assistant is a multi-directional listening post with seven microphones arranged in a circular array. Likewise, it has 360 degree speakers to play back audio clearly to wherever you’re standing.


Amazon will be releasing Fire OS and Android companion apps to help manage your information and view your lists, while desktop and iOS users can user access the system via their browsers.

People are accustomed to using voice control on their phones and in their cars, but homes are one area where the technology has hardly made a dent. It’s not hard to imagine how a voice assistant could come in handy at home: you could pull up recipes while cooking, check the weather while getting dressed or get definitions while reading a book. Whether Echo actually performs well, however, remains to be seen.



The device will go on sale for  $199, but for a limited time, Prime members can purchase theirs for $99. You’ll probably have to wait, however; sales are currently invite-only. 






Google's Nest Will Track You Closely To Make Its Thermostat More Efficient





Nest’s thermostat will be paying a little closer attention to you.
Nest calls its thermostat the “Learning Thermostat,” because its software algorithms are designed to learn your schedule and automatically set your temperature for maximum comfort and efficiency. Its 4.3 software update it announced today is going to make the thermostat learn your schedule a whole lot better.




Called the “Enhanced Auto Schedule,” the update will incorporate more information about user patterns and occupancy information into the algorithm. As an example, the thermostat will be able to figure out when your schedule shifts to when your kids go back to school. The updated thermostat software will more quickly incorporate that information into the algorithm.

“The main improvements in our algorithm is the way it compiles and analyzes additional information from the home,” said Maxime Veron, head of product marketing at Nest, in a phone call. “In order to make the home save more energy and keep it comfortable, we are putting much more weight [in the algorithm] to occupancy in the home. We are learning the schedule better based on understanding occupancy better. This enables the thermostat to save more energy.”


In Nest’s white paper on the updated auto-schedule feature, it says: “Every interaction is treated as a way for the user to communicate with the device about his or her preferences for a particular temperature at a particular time and day of the week. In addition to considering active interactions, we also consider lack of interactions (indicating satisfaction with the current temperature), as well as the room temperature and whether the user is home or away. This provides a more holistic view of user preference than was considered previously.”

Based on simulation testing, Nest claims that this updated feature will be able to save 23.1 percent in cooling and 19.5 percent in heating for users. That adds 6.1 percent for cooling and 5.6 percent for heating over its old algorithm. But this is only in simulation testing. The tricky part is actually seeing these kinds of savings consistently.


 


A big problem for Nest and all the other so-called smart thermostats on the market is demonstrating energy savings. Yes, they will probably save you some energy, but how much varies widely. There are too many variables involved and no standardized method of evaluating energy savings to give a reliable figure. Geographical location, the type of house and how users behave all factor into how much energy these devices are actually able to save.

Nest recently got in a spat with cloud-based energy management software maker EcoFactor about which company can save consumers more energy. EcoFactor came out in October brandishing third-party test results claiming that they showed its software algorithms were more effective than Nest’s in saving energy. The study showed, for example, that thermostats using EcoFactor’s software reduced peak load by 2.7 kW per thermostat. That’s twice the amount Nest claimed at 1.18 kW per device. Nest shot back in a blog post on its website saying that the comparisons were unfair and that EcoFactor was comparing completely different timeframes.


 


“With a lot of these companies putting in hardware and software into the home like Nest or Honeywell’s Lyric thermostat or whatever, energy savings depend on many variables,” said Neil Strother, principal research analyst at Navigant Research. “It’s hard to get apples-to-apples comparisons.”

One thing is for sure, though, making sure Nest’s algorithms keep better tabs of its users certainly won’t get in the way of cutting down on energy.

“We are learning more about the home,” said Veron. “We can carve out more savings based on that.”










Now open hotel rooms with just your smartphone




Starting this week, you can use a smartphone app to open your room at some Aloft, Element and W hotels. Over the next few months, Starwood (which owns those three chains) will upgrade 150 of its hotels to allow keyless, smartphone entry to some 30,000 rooms worldwide. Hilton, which is a much larger hotel chain, plans to roll out a similar system next year. Keyless entry via smartphone is obviously more convenient than using a magnetic swipe card (which is easily lost or demagnetized), and probably a lot more secure, too, considering how easy it was to hack conventional Onity locks. Did I mention that keyless entry also means you can skip the check-in desk and go straight to your room, too?


  


Keyless hotel room entry works like this. You enroll your phone by installing an app. On the day of your stay at the hotel, a “key” (some kind of encrypted code) is sent to your phone via a push notification, along with a message telling you which room number you’ll be staying in. Then, you just hold your phone near your hotel room door, and voila — it unlocks. In this case, the app is Starwood Preferred Guest (SPG) — a loyalty scheme for its Aloft, Element, and W hotel chains.


Starwood will have to roll out brand new locks that support this new form of keyless entry — but beyond the fact that Bluetooth is used between the phone and lock, we know very few technical details. In an interview with the BBC, the company that made the new locks — HID Global — says it uses its own AES encryption method, with a “rotating key.” This could imply that the locks themselves are not networked — i.e. they’re standalone devices — and that they just rotate through a series of unlock codes. 




This is probably safer than the Onity magnetic key card locks — which could be hacked very simply with an Arduino — but if anyone reverse-engineers the encryption algorithm then this new keyless scheme might not be much safer. (And unlocking millions of hotel rooms with a smartphone is an even lower barrier to entry than using an Arduino!) A much better alternative would be connecting each room lock to a central computer — so that a smarter encryption/unlocking method could be used — but I’m guessing the cost of running new cabling/routers for tens of thousands of hotel rooms was prohibitive. 


Security concerns aside, keyless entry with a smartphone is so, so superior to magnetic swipe cards. First, it’s much harder to lose a smartphone. Second, your smartphone can’t be demagnetized by other things in your pocket. Third, you can skip check-in completely and go straight to your hotel room — and you can skip the check-out, too. The only problem I can see is if your smartphone runs out of battery — and it also isn’t clear how you would handle multiple people sharing the same room (does everyone get the key sent to their phone?) I assume there is some kind of fall-back solution available in such situations — Bluetooth-enabled cards that can be handed out by the front desk, or something along those lines.




Starting Wednesday, November 5, 10 Starwood hotels will be enabled for keyless entry via the SPG app. The plan is to have 30,000 rooms enabled in 150 Aloft, Element, and W hotels by “early 2015.” Next year, Hilton is expected to begin the roll-out of a similar system, with somewhere in the region of 4,000 hotels — 600,000 rooms — being enabled for keyless entry by the end of 2016.





BMW Tests Its M4 On The Ultimate Race Track – An Aircraft Carrier!

                  


Are you a BMW fan? Well, who are we kidding over here? Everyone is a BMW fan and the reason is its dauntingly flawless design, throw in some cool engine along with innovative technology and there you have it; the perfect mix known as BMW. What is more fascinating about the BMW is the awesome ads that the automobile company comes up with. Don’t believe us? Wait till you check out the video at the end of this post that will demonstrate how amazing the M4 is as it tears around a track on an aircraft carrier.




Although the video may not be real – the officials from BMW have not confirmed that yet – but it sure is quite amazing and thrilling. You can actually Feel the need for speed rising within oneself while the ad is playing. The track resembles the Gymkhana series of DC owner Ken Block and you can witness the 430Hp M4 speeding on the Ultimate Racetrack that is afloat at the sea.


 


Cundari, the BMW agency in Canada was contacted for comment, however, the Chief Creative officer by the name of Andrew Simon quite skillfully averted the question and responded in the following words; ‘We know there is debate and we encourage that. One thing that is for sure is that the M4’s dynamic performance on the Ultimate Racetrack is thrilling viewers all around the world and for that we’re thrilled’. Well played Andrew Simon, well played!  






You’ll find quite a heated debate going on about the validity of the video, but like we said, let’s focus more on how awesome the concept is and how amazingly the car has been designed. M4 has been designed to trade places with M3 Coupe and M3 Convertible models and supports a 3liter twin turbo engine. The transmission is 7-speed M-DCT that allows M4 to reach 60Mph in 3.9 seconds while weighing less than 1,500 kg.


 












Google’s self-driving cars: Implications for the auto industry and the key role of machine perception







Google’s self driving car effort is a threat to the auto industry. The company is the clear leader in autonomous vehicle technology and several years ahead of all other auto makers, including Daimler and Volvo. By presenting an all-electric prototype of a fully autonomous two-seater in May, Google has also made clear that it is serious to become a player in individual mobility and intent on reaping the rewards of its investment in this project (which so far has likely cost a few hundred million Dollars – not an enormous amount by the standards of the auto industry for developing a new car model).

What are the implications for the auto industry? They have much more experience in all aspects of mobility and are also working on autonomous vehicles. Could Google really be a signficant threat?





The standard answer to this question has been denial: Last year the main argument was something like: They may be able to build great software but they don’t know how to design a car. Now that they have designed a steer-by-wire two-seater with redundant layout of all safety-critical components and skillfully navigated the regulations – including limiting the speed to 25mph – , the argument is updated: They may be able to build a slow-moving two seater, but they can’t build a real car. And even if they could, they could not produce it in any meaningful volume.

As they overcome each objection, denial becomes harder, and additional time is lost. The argument that Google would not be able ramp up production is misguided. Google has no intention to challenge the auto makers on their playing field. It will change the game by providing autonomous mobility services rather than selling cars. Each Google autonomous car will then reduce the demand for privately owned cars by a factor of 5 to 10. This will have an impact on auto makers. It will affect their strategies, stock prices and make production capacity much easier to acquire.





Instead of denial, auto makers need to understand the magnitude of the threat. Self-driving cars will be a disruptive force; they will change the business model of the auto industry and bring hard times to most auto makers because demand for passenger cars will fall significantly. From a global perspective this is a good thing because resources will be used much more efficiently, alternative propellants can be used much more readily within autonomous mobility services and the strain on the environment (both pollution and land-use) will fall.



But it will be hard for the auto industry to adapt to these changes. Cars have been produced for more than a century. The requisite knowledge is widely available. The same does not apply to a key ingredient for self-driving cars: Teaching a machine to perceive its environment. Perception is the core problem which determines the success of a self-driving car.





As a consequence, auto manufacturers who want to beat Google to a fully autonomous car, will need to carefully consider the additional opportunities which advanced perception could bring and determine how to integrate these opportunities into their strategy. Instead of narrowing the perception task to specific driving scenarios, auto makers should consider whether they could leverage their perception activities in additional ways.

Machine perception is the core competence for succeeding with autonomous cars. Auto makers need to give this capability top priority if they want to recover the ground already lost to Google.